VERIFICATION INFRASTRUCTURE FOR TOKENIZED ASSETS

Verify a tokenized asset before your application lists, routes, accepts or monitors it

JUJING connects exact onchain identifiers with instrument identity, documented rights, token controls, lifecycle changes and reproducible evidence.

Corporate Action Guard

Know when a tokenized asset changes

JUJING connects issuer lifecycle events to the exact onchain representation, then produces integration-ready data with provenance and deterministic evidence receipts.

For wallets, exchanges, DeFi protocols, market operators and tokenized-asset integration teams reviewing how material asset changes affect their systems.

  • Exact contract or mint binding
  • Normalized corporate-action and lifecycle events
  • Issuer claim and onchain observation separation
  • Operational guidance for affected integrations
  • Evidence provenance and deterministic receipts
  • Explicit stale, incomplete and NOT_ESTABLISHED states

Explore the historical working demonstration and live read-only APIs. Continuous production monitoring, active webhook delivery and an SLA are not currently provided.

Pilot inquiries: contact@jujingwhale.xyz

01 / Identity before equivalence

A ticker is not an identity

Same company.
Different instrument.

Two tokens can reference the same company while having different issuers, legal structures, holder rights, controls and eligibility. A symbol alone cannot tell your application what it is accepting.

See the comparison dimensions →

02 / The evidence model

One record, four evidence layers

01

Identity

Exact network and identifier. The underlying reference stays separate from each representation.

02

Evidence

Documented claims, retained observations, provenance and content digests.

03

Lifecycle

Attributed events and required actions, with time precision and unresolved relationships.

04

Exposure

Scoped observations and availability. Production exposure remains NOT_ESTABLISHED.

03 / Application decisions

Built for integration decisions

Wallets

Explain which representation a user holds, and which controls apply.

Distribution platforms

Check identity and evidence boundaries before including an asset.

Venues and aggregators

Keep exact instruments separate when evaluating routing and acceptance.

Risk and monitoring systems

Use retained lifecycle and exposure evidence as explicit inputs.

04 / Explicit result semantics

What JUJING returns

Evidence with its limits attached

An established identity can coexist with incomplete rights evidence. A matching receipt can be stale. Missing exposure is not zero exposure.

Read result semantics →
PRESENT
Present in retained reviewed registry records; no safety or eligibility conclusion.
INCOMPLETE
Some required evidence remains unresolved, including OURA’s overall evidence.
NOT_ESTABLISHED
A fact or conclusion is not established; it is never replaced with an assumed value.
STALE / STALE_EVIDENCE
Freshness is separate from record integrity and completeness.
UNKNOWN_REPRESENTATION
No exact admitted identifier match. A shared ticker is not a fallback.
IDENTITY_MISMATCH
The API fails closed when exposure identity does not match the requested representation.

05 / Public working examples

Working evidence

06 / A deliberate boundary

Designed to fail closed

Unknown stays unknown.

Missing evidence is not proof of absence. Shared tickers do not establish identity, equivalent rights or interchangeable instruments. Publisher statements remain attributed statements.

JUJING is independent verification infrastructure for tokenized assets. It supports application decisions; it does not make a legal, reserve, eligibility, safety or investment approval.

Evidence before action

Use JUJING as a verification input

Inspect exact identifiers. Preserve provenance. Handle unresolved states explicitly.

Explore the developer API →